He does talk about patents, trademark and copyright in some generality, but I think he could have added some details about patent trolls and especially copyright trolls like Righthaven (although much of the activity in this area, documented by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and other groups like Ars Technica, has happened after the book was published).
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Mike Young's "Internet Laws": a useful handbook and guide for Internet business entrepreneurs
Author: Mike Young, Esq.
Title: “Internet Laws: How to Protect Your Business Website
Without a Lawyer”
Publication: Dallas: Internet Attorneys Media, 2011, ISBN 978-1460942093, 190 pages, paper,
28 chapters, indexed.
Amazon link for purchase.
.The first observation to make about this guide is that it
is intended mainly for people who really want to run a for-profit web or
Internet business. It isn’t primarily intended
to address self-publishing, or even the running of discussion forums or blogs
with multiple contributors, with perhaps only nominal advertising revenue. (That really is my own background.) It’s more about sales on the Internet.
Young starts out with the basics, particularly discussing
the business format that one should set up.
Avoid proprietorships (sole or general) and consider Chapter S or
limited liability corporations . He discusses the tax implications and legal
liability shield aspects for these arrangements in some detail. Setting up the right structure may be one of
the most important decisions an Internet entrepreneur can make.
Another big basic piece of advice that occurs much later, is
to keep very careful business records
and pay attention to your own local government and state’s business, sales, and
income tax laws. Internet taxation is
tricky, to the chagrin of some people who want to be Amazon affiliates in some
states.
Most of the chapters of the book are short, but in many of
them Young reveals the dangers that can lurk for the unwary entrepreneur. One of the most dangerous possibilities is to be accused of sending spam from your email server, if hacked. Young recommends outsourcing email management
to large hosting companies experienced in handling the security issues.
He does talk about domain names, and the increasing risk of
unintentional trademark infringement. He recommends not using the same company
to host the site as the domain name, although I have done so with no problems,
and setup may be easier if you use just one company.
He does talk about patents, trademark and copyright in some generality, but I think he could have added some details about patent trolls and especially copyright trolls like Righthaven (although much of the activity in this area, documented by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and other groups like Ars Technica, has happened after the book was published).
He does talk about patents, trademark and copyright in some generality, but I think he could have added some details about patent trolls and especially copyright trolls like Righthaven (although much of the activity in this area, documented by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and other groups like Ars Technica, has happened after the book was published).
A number of the chapters in the book talk about “risky”
website businesses, involving gambling, pornography, “getting something for
nothing”, possibly illegal customers overseas (associated with drugs or
terrorism). He avoids any moralizing or pontification,
and just states the “facts”, I wasn't aware that search engines had been forced to remove links to some gambling sites. He has a
chapter on the privacy issues of setting up websites for children (COPPA), and
with the laws on content that brushes against child pornography. He mentions only very briefly the litigation
(against the CDA and later COPA, to which I was a plaintiff personally) which
has made most child-protective “censorship” unconstitutional. The issues involving minors, despite favorable
Supreme Court rulings, can become quite tricky, and I’ve discussed his material
(since February 10, 2013) in more detail on another blog (trace through Blogger
Profile here), “Some approaches to filtering or labeling Internet content”. He does discuss adult identification
verification (AVS), and a recent development in self-labeling technology,
RTALabel.
He does cover the issue of product endorsement, and FTC
rules for bloggers who get products to review.
In fact, I do get free DVD’s from some independent movie distributors to
review on my Movie Reviews blog, and I do follow the FTC requirement and
mention that I got a review copy. Once,
I got a “short film” DVD from an oil company! One question I wonder about movie and book reviews (for fiction). Could premature spoilers cause a legal problem?
He does talk about downstream liability, particularly with
respect to requirements of DMCA Safe Harbor, if a webmaster who services
publication by others gets a copyright infringement complaint. But I don’t see any mention of the Section
230 provisions of the 1996 Telecommunications Act (better known as the
Communications Decency Act). These
provisions, controversial in the child protection community, generally do
shield blogging service providers and Internet hosting companies from civil
liability (like for libel) for what users post.
But CSA230 also protects forums from liability from what users post, and
bloggers from comments (even when some moderation of content is done, within
certain limits).
He also warns about the practical risks of what we sometimes
call ‘negligent publication” or of accidental invasions of privacy (false
light) or unintentional indirect libel. For example, someone giving instructions as to
how to rape or build a weapon might get sued by a victim of an actual crime
following the recipe. (Where does “personal
responsibility” for the acts of others end in the law? That sounds like the gun control debate
today.) For another example, a
fictitious story with a character that clearly resembles a real person and
presents the person falsely in an unfavorable way could still lead to
libel. There is a case (which he doesn’t
name) in California, Bindrim v. Miller (1979) that establishes this idea,
although it hasn’t always held in other states (like New York). Even fictive “self-libel”, for purposes of
demonstration, can lead to trouble, as I found out when I worked as a
substitute teacher (the “BillBoushka” blog, July 27, 2007). I ran into school officials who wanted to
make an existential matter of my ultimate “motives” (leading to an obscure are
that we call “implicit content”).
He does talk about online reputation and what to do about customer smearing on review sites, and briefly covers how social media can affect online reputation. He does not recommend "gag order" contracts with customers, which some medical professionals try to implement.
I want to note that the issue of photography of individuals in "public" places (like bars and discos) has suddenly become a sensitive matter, in practice if not yet in the law, and has gotten discussed on television (as on Anderson Cooper's show). This has happened rather quickly, since the book was published in 2011. I wonder what he would say about it.
Young’s book is somewhat didactic in nature, advising the
user to read the entire work cover to cover and giving a lot of “Mother May I
baby steps” along the way. He does
mention the Internet Ethics Council (link ), and the Internet Attorneys Association (link ).
I want to note something else that the author mentions at
the get-go, in his Introduction. Anyone
who tries to establish himself or herself on the Web does run a slight risk of becoming
targeted by someone who is mentally ill or criminal, both physically and (more
likely) in terms of cybercrime and Identity theft. The possibility of being “framed” on the web
by a virus for a crime (like child pornography), while usually remote, deserves
attention. There have been some
prosecutions in this area, and apparently at least one wrongful conviction or
confession in Arizona based on a 2006 case where the state tried to impose an “absolute
liability” theory. He could have gone
into this in more detail.
The YouTube video features the author in an interview with
Open Source Marketer.
I did want to add one more personal anecdote to this
review. Despite the fact that I named my
first book in 1997 “Do Ask Do Tell….”, I used the acronym “hppub.com” (as a
short acronym for “High Productivity Publishing”) for my first website in
1997. I set up a “Do Ask Do Tell” second
site in 1999, which I still have. I got rid of “hppub” in the summer of 2005
and migrated all the material to “Do Ask Do Tell”. I felt uncomfortable with a meaningless
domain name which I might not justify forever.
Someone actually offered me money for it ($50) on Paypal in 2005, but I
refused. Soon, I saw that “hppub” was
used for an offshore gambling site. I
had to make sure I fixed all my links quickly not to go there. By around 2009 or so, the gambling site had
gone away and now seemed to be some sort of mysterious site in Australia, which
doesn’t work right now (the last time I checked).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Thank you for the absolutely wonderful job you did on this blog.Good Job Keep it up and thank you for all of your hard work
News4andhra.com is a Telugu news portal and provides
Telugu Movie News, Latest and Breaking News on Political News and Telugu Movie Reviews at one place
really awesome i liked it very much keep going on
Thank you for the absolutely wonderful job you did
on this blog.Good Job Keep it up and thank you for all of your hard work
Definition of Youngsters Valuable Life
Post a Comment