Tuesday, September 10, 2013
Tom Palmer has new anthology, "Why Liberty"
Author (editor): Tom G. Palmer
Title: “Why Liberty: Your Life, Choices, Your Future”
Publication: 2013, by Jameson Books, Atlas and Students for
Liberty; ISBN 978-0-89803-172-0, 143 pages, paper, indexed, A Preface and
twelve essays.
Mr. Palmer is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, and is
Executive Vice President for international programs at the Atlas Network.
The book comprises essays by a number or authors : three by
Tom Palmer himself, as well as John Stossel (former ABC News producer and
reporter), Clark Ruper, James Padilioni, Jr., Alexander McCobin, Sarah Skwire.
Aaron Ross Powell, Olumayoma Okediran, Sloane Frost, and Lode Cossaer and
Martin Wegge (together).
A few high points need to be stressed. Tom Palmer’s “The History and Structure of
Libertarian Thought” talks about the “Libertarian Tripod”: individual rights,
spontaneous order, and constitutionally limited government. The idea of spontaneous order occurs with
social insects, and Palmer seems to have more confidence than some that it can
generate eusociality (see the concern by Charles Murray about social capital in
his “Coming Apart”, March 14, 2012 here).
The chapter “The Political Principles of Liberty” by McCobin
seems to get at the deepest controversy.
McCobin compares these to other political principles, which stress ideas
like “fraternalism” (or “fraternity”), the idea that people have an intrinsic
responsibility to provide for others outside of the scope of their own personal
choices or voluntary “contracts”; and “equal outcomes”. McCobin goes on to discuss the difference
between politics and ethics. McCobin
writes that the heart of ethical behavior is to act as if “you” respect the
other person as an independent moral agent. That sounds pretty much like the
“Golden Rule”.
People who are “different” (like me) often report that
others expect them to take responsibilities that they did not elect, and that
these responsibilities compete with or interfere with their own personal goals,
pursuing things that they are good at.
This may happen even though they think they are honest and ethical in
the narrower sense understood by libertarian.
They experience “coercion”, which
may be from the state (the military draft, previous anti-gay social policies),
from family or sometimes other agents like employers. Libertarians obviously focus on not letting
the state apply coercion in personal matters.
But libertarians may not want to interfere with the ability of families
or employers to implement their own notions, as they trust that a properly
functioning free market inhibits irrational discrimination. This often works, but in some areas,
“different” people find that they experience resentment or indignation from
others who claim that “the special” benefitted in the past from the unseen
sacrifices of others, who started farther back in line. Parents, when making wills, may want
unmarried or childless adult children to be prepared to help raise the children
of siblings or care for other family members, and could stipulate that in
wills, and libertarians would not interfere with estates. Libertarians might have an issue when
debating “filial responsibility laws” if
the result of such coercion is to save the taxpayer from supporting other
people’s elders (but you have the same concept with mandatory individual health
insurance under Obamacare). I think that
the ukase (or lack of ) to be prepared to take care of others when necessary
(and not just when you “choose” to have children) is a fundamental moral issue,
transcending ethics even as Palmer and McCobin describe it. .
Okediran (“Africa’s Promise of Liberty”) discusses
libertarian principles in more rural, primitive communities and maintains that
libertarianism can be commensurate with commutarianism, found in intentional
communities (with “income sharing”), which is not the same as communism.
Sloane Frost (“The Tangled Dynamics of State
Interventionism: The Case of Health Care”) gives the usual conservative
arguments against nationalized heath care and traces our current problems to
preferential tax treatment in the past to employer-sponsored health care with
pre-tax dollars.
Aaron Ross Powell introduces an interesting notion of
humility in politics with “The Humble Case for Liberty”.
Amazon does not have this book yet. There is a similarly titled book by Marc Guttman.
Students for Liberty has a site for it here. Palmer handed this out at a GLIL gathering
Sunday September 8, 2003.
The video above shows Palmer talking about an earlier book, “The
Morality of Capitalism:: What Professors Wont Tell You”.
This would be a good place to mention a pair of companion books by David Boaz from the Free Press in the 1990's, "Libertarianism: A Primer" and a companion "Libertarian Reader", a book of essays.
Thursday, September 05, 2013
"Gridlock": former US Senator pens novel warning that cyberattack could destroy the electric power grid, permanently
Authors: Byron L Dorgan and David Hagberg
Title: “Gridlock”
Publication: New York: Forge, 2013. ISBN 978-0-7653-2738-3,
431 pages, hardcover (also available as e-book), 4 Parts, 76 chapters with
Prologue and Epilogue
Amazon link is here.
Mr. Dorgan is a former US Senator and Representative from North
Dakota, and Mr. Hagberg is a former U.S. Air Force cryptographer.
Let’s cut to the chase.
The authors propose a scenario where enemies of the American people (and
it seems to be our “way of life” as much as our government) – specifically Venezuela
and Iran (and maybe Putin’s Russia) – try to cripple the US power grid
permanently with a single computer work coded by a “gifted” and sociopathic
hacker in Amsterdam. It’ a little
confusing as to how it is delivered, and I’ll get back to that in a moment. There’s
also a physical attack on a transformer farm in South Texas, a concept which
sounds a lot more probable.
The book is fast paced, written in short chapters, and has a
number of character, including a hired Russian assassin, and a young sheriff in
North Dakota, himself a Special Forces Afghanistan combat hero who lost a leg
to IED but knows how to use his prosthesis as an additional weapon – along with
his girl friend, a determined journalist.
The novel refers to Hugo Chavez and Ahmadinejad, both out
now, as forming an alliance to teach an arrogant American people a lesson. It’s interesting that Senator Dorgan sees “rogue”
states (which would include North Korea and now Syria) as a bigger threat now than
decentralized terrorists downloading do-it-yourself materials from the Internet
(as with Boston).
The authors lay out a scenario where occasional rural
vandalism against power stations happen, as from disgruntled ranchers. In this scenario, a lineman is sent to repair
damage to a truss in a river valley near the Badlands in western North Dakota
(I was there myself in 1998). Through a
computer hack, he is electrocuted when he thinks the line is de-energized. (Can you imagine doing the job of a lineman? I couldn't do it.) Nearby visitors are sniped, setting up the
chase. A good part of the novel text
does involve the hunting and chasing of the Russian assassin Yuri Makarov (who
reminds me of Clive Barker’s Pie ‘o’ Pah from “Imajica”). The action is crisp and well-written, but
considerable (and happens in many locations and countries). This book would generate a four-hour
screenplay, which could present a problem when Hollywood gets it (unless it’s a
TV or cable miniseries). Who plays the
nimble sheriff Nate Osborne? Joseph
Gordon-Levitt? Ryan Gosling? You wonder if Mark Parrish, Lucas Till or
Reid Ewing should try for a part like this.
Oh, maybe Till could play the hacker. How do you deal with Nate’s leg loss and
prosthesis in filming? For Makarov, you
need an actor who normally seems meaner.
Maybe Ciaran Hinds. Directing him
would even be harder.
Okay, let me get back on subject. (I’d love to cast my own novel.) How was the virus delivered? If it was conveyed by a flash drive (I think
that’s how Stuxnet was placed in Iran), you need a “saboteur”, Hitchcock style,
inside the electric utility industry.
(The Prologue of the novel hints at this, as does the denouement, but in
between the details aren’t shown.) What
I don’t buy is the idea that a remote hacker could transmit a virus through the
Internet to a power grid station. That
would say that a hacker could log on to my laptop (where I type this review) and use
my Internet connection (soon to be used to upload it) to reach the power
station. I think that this simply should
not be possible. There is a branch of
mathematics called graph theory, part of topology, which can calculate whether
such a connected path exists. I think it
should not.
As for the “blackmail” and the announced rolling blackouts,
why can’t the power industry, with the help of the NSA if needed, neutralize
the virus since it knows what it is and knows that it is coming.
Dorgan is right in suggesting that replacing the three large
transformers in Texas would be very time consuming, because in part they have
to come from India. But that tells me
that the biggest threat to the grid comes from physical attack, or perhaps an
electromagnetic pulse (as in “One Second After”, reviewed July 20, 2012), or
even a severe geomagnetic storm. A
physical attack could come from large scale vandalism and conventional
explosives, or even from radio frequency flux guns. I don’t think that the electric power
industry is as well prepared for these more physical threats as it is for
computer viruses which would have to get through some super secure server farms
(one of which is nearby in Ashburn, Loudoun County VA; there are various others
in North Carolina, Texas, Utah, Colorado, etc).
Dorgan says he has changed some details about the power
industry so as not to write a “blueprint” for an attack.
Wikipedia attribution link for Theodore Roosevelt National
Park
Update: Oct. 9, 2013
Look at this story about power grid attacks in Arkansas in the real world, much as in this novel, link.
Update: Oct. 9, 2013
Look at this story about power grid attacks in Arkansas in the real world, much as in this novel, link.
Update: Feb. 5, 2014
The Wall Street Journal discusses an attack on the Metfcalf power substation near San Jose CA on April 16, 2016, blog posting on the Issues Blog today, WSJ link here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)