Interesting books, and news items about books and periodicals, particularly with respect to political and social issues. Since May, 2016, many of my larger book reviews have been put on a hosted Wordpress site; so now this blog emphasizes previews, interviews with authors, booklets, large periodical articles, and literary business issues. Note: no one pays me for these reviews; they are not "endorsements"!
Will the “Google-Memo-Guy” James Damore write a book? I
wondered that on Aug. 21 when I wrote a post on the movies blog “Milo Meets
James Damore”.
But his “Memo” called “Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber”,
which Wikipedia labels as a “Manifesto on Workplace Diversity” qualifies at
least as a booklet now.You can find it
(in two formats) on James Damore’s own site “Fired for Truth”.
The original memo is well footnoted and clearly argued.Damore seems to say mainly that employers
should not focus on meeting particular numbers to achieve diversity, especially
regarding gender in tech employment. Damore’s
firing apparently came after an unfooted version went viral on social media in
early August 2017.
Damore has filed class-action suit against Google, explained here.Since he hasn’t tweeted much
lately, it seems logical that the relative quiet as wise for the litigation.
The suit seems a bit silly.But so does
Google’s termination of Damore.Whether
it is OK to circulate a controversial memo in the workplace depends on the conduct
code of the employer.But apparently
Google (unlike most corporate employers) allowed this practice, even encouraged
it, and Damore’s content, understood properly, is reasonably objective and in
no way hateful.(A few of his past
tweets, like one about the KKK, did seem off the mark to me.) But he is challenging the left-wing idea of political
correctness, of making policies according to groups and “intersectionality”.
In fact, The Knife, (Jens Erik Gould) has an article "The Misrepesentation of James Damore", including an addendum about the NLRB's surprising attack on him, as well as details as to how the memo was actually invited and circulated at Google. Major media outlets characterized his memo with subjective characterizations typical of left-wing bias, and Knife says Damore's memo actually had relatively little deception language or metaphors compared to normal political writing.
As for my reaction to his memo, I’m particularly drawn to his
opening table on Left v. Right biases. I am somewhat biased to the Right on his
first three points, but I think that change is often good and am open to some
of it.I do see humans as competitive
and personal inequality as inevitable.But I also think that as a moral point, if those who are more advantaged
don’t reach out personally to those who are not, society can become unstable
and vulnerable to authoritarianism (especially fascism).
But the Left tends to mix up this ironic
setting of personal responsibility (as libertarians see it) with group
membership.
While Damore’s points seem, from a clinical and statistical
view, to be valid, we should remember that in real life, it is the exceptions
that swallow the rules. The 2016 film “Hidden
Figures” made the point about female mathematicians at NASA in the early 1960s.Women made many contributions to computing in
the early days, such as the invention of COBOL.In the 1960s, I found it common to have women working as programmers and
mathematicians in the Navy department in summer jobs, as well as with graduate
school (Ph D candidates).Female math
and science teachers were common in the 1950s and early 60s, in my own
experience.When I worked for Univac in
1972-1974, I found plenty of women in management; Univac seemed more
competitive then than big rival IBM.I
would generally expect to find in tech today with no particular emphasis on measuring
diversity numbers by gender.
Paul Lewis writes in the Guardian about Damore, "I see things differently: James Damore on his autism and the Google memo", here. Some autism, as in "The Good Doctor", is depicted as the hyper-masculine, hyper-logical brain. One important supporting observation seems to follow the ideas of George Gilder ("Men and Marriage", 1986); in a real world, men are fungible, and of all the men that have lived, only 40% have descendants today, compared to 80% of women. This fits into an inevitable result that statistically most men will have some physical and connected personality traits that separate them from women and make them more suitable for certain kinds of work. We don't quarrel about the fact that major professional sports are generally male-only (I think we'll have a trans relief pitcher in baseball some day.) Damore doesn't offer any evidence that the patterns are any different for cis gay men than the general male population.
The April 2018 issue of Foreign Affairs offers several detailed
articles supporting the cover theme “Is Democracy Dying? A Global Report”.
The most important article is probably the first one, by
Walter Russell Mead, “The Big Shift: How American Democracy Fails Its Way to
Success”, link.The writer gets into discussing Piketty’s book
“Capital” and his theory of inequality (review here July 22, 2014). Mead argues that growing inequality, even in
a low-unemployment economy, tends to drive people more toward tribal thinking
and political divisiveness.He suggests
we need to consider ideas like basic income (which Finland is stopping) or
other ways of redistribution of wealth.
The second article is “The Age of Insecurity: Can Democracy
Save Itself?’I am reminded of Leonard
Bernstein’s “Age of Anxiety” symphony. The article explains that in the 21st
Century, some authoritarian societies are providing a better standard of living
than previously expected by libertarian and Reagan-style conservatives in the U.S.
Both writers note that a rise in the standard of living
tends to take people away from materialism and tends to make liberal democracy
and individualism make more sense;but
then inequality can lead to cultural backslide toward group survivalism and
prepper culture.
Yascha Mount and Roberto Stefan Foa write “The End of the
Democratic Century: Autocracy’s Soft Power” which has to do with greater materialistic
success and a larger presence of academia in relatively authoritarian
countries, like the health science centers in the UAE and even Saudi Arabia, as
well as professional media.
There are two big articles on China.Yuen Ang writes “Autocracy with Chinese Characteristics:
Beijing’s Behind the Scenes Reforms” The author explains how in China politics
is embedded in bureaucracy, which can then motivate its citizens with a hierarchal
structure of pseudo capitalism and rewards.China is a unary, not a federal, state.
Then there is “China’s New Revolution: The Reign of Xi Jingping”,
by Elizabeth C. Economy.There is some
focus on the authoritarian control of individualism and free speech (with the
firewalls against the outside world, not always effective).Most of all, it seems that Jingping’s (and
his predecessors’, post Mao) implementation of Communism (an ideology which students
memorize) is predicated on “right-sizing” individual people so that they know
where they must fit in according to their abilities;otherwise they would be treated as mooches (hence
the proposed “social credit score” by 2020).The dangerous trend to arrest people who became citizens of othjer
countries when they return to China is mentioned.Jingping has crowned himself president for
life and abolished term limits (which used to be part of the Chinese system of
political integrity).
Ivan Kratsev explores “Eastern Europe’s Illiberal
Revolution: The Long Road to Democratic Decline.”I remember that back in 1989 the people of
eastern Europe were held up to grade pride, with Leonard Bernstein recording
Beethoven’s Ninth in a reunified Berlin near the Wall.But emigration to the west (and low birth rates), followed by
immigration from troubled and non-democratic parts of the world has made the
remaining people feel threatened, and turn to populism, and some authoritarianism
(Orban in Hungary), which the writer does not see as fascist, despite the
labels. Like Putin, leadership wants to raise the standard of living for its
ethnic populations by keeping them disciplined and not too loquacious.
\
Victor Cha (Georgetown, with Katrin Fraser Katz), whom Trump
turned down for an ambassadorship after Victor criticized Trump’s aggressive
rhetoric, has an article on how to
coerce North Korea, previously covered.
Fast Company in April 2018 has a couple challenging
articles.
Austin Carr and Harry McCracken, in an article ”#Hijacked”
(p 58), explore how Twitter and CEO Jack Dorsey started out with a dream of
free speech, and wound up as fodder for the trolls, want to spread discontent
borne out of group inequality. The article discusses a lot of attempts to monitor
content and Silicon Valley’s looking for imaginary solutions to their problems
with tribalism.
The article suggests that Congress will probably undo all of
the intermediary downstream liability protections in Section 230, which have already
happened with the Backpage matter and the FOSTA law.
The article has a 2018 Social Media Safety Report Card,
where Facebook got the lowest grade, then YouTube and then Reddit.
On p 86, Matthew Shaer covers “The People’s Choice”, a
portrait of master chef Jose Andres, in litigation against Trump over a hotel
deal.It covers his volunteer efforts to
set up cooking operations in Puerto Rico and Houston after the hurricanes, and
in California after the wildfires. Of course, he has the practical skills and business
scale to volunteer like this to help rebuild. He is very good for resilience.
Ronan Farrow, now 30, one of TV’s “prettiest” cis-male
journalists (from the New Yorker), has a new book, “War on Peace: The End of Diplomacy
and the Decline of American Influence”, due April 24 from Norton.
Here’s a chapter from the New Yorker, “Inside Rex Tillerson’s
Ouster: The Last Days of His Brief and Chaotic Tenure as Secretary of State”.
It seems like it was never meant to be.Tillerson did seem to play lip service with human
rights.But a couple months ago, pundits
were saying that Trump’s carelessness with keeping positions at state and ambassadorships
filled was downright dangerous (the Professor Cha mess on Korea).
Today Fareed Zakaria interviewed Madeleine Albright on his
GPS show on CNN, and talked about her new book, “Fascism: A Warning”, publishedby Harper (304 pages).
Albright made the pointed comment that people have lost
interest in running for office because of hyperpartisanship and polarization. She
is appropriately concerned about Trump’s lack of respect for the press and for
truth and his tendency to play favorites, believing that might can make right
for people who feel ignored (his base) by the intellectual elites.
Christian Caryl takes upthe question as to whether the US
is headed for fascism (rather remarkable that he feels he has to) with some
criticism of her book here.But it seems
that the unwillingness of a lot of people to get outside of their own bubbles,
maybe out of personal ego, adds to the risk.
Publication: 2016: Icon Books, London, ISBN 978-178578-071-4, 176 pages,
paper.
I
I saw this book in the campus bookstore at Drexel in
Philadelphia, run by Barnes and Noble, and picked it up on impulse.
It’s rather interesting to format a book that amounts to a
historical encyclopedia on political and philosophical terms related to gay
rights presented as a “graphic novel” with illustrations in black and
whiteThe pictures take about 70% of the
space in the book, whereas the rest is rather straightforward Wiki-like text.
Then the authors pose characters who talk more about the concepts, as if in an
animated documentary film.
The central question is, what is “queer”, which has become a
fashionable term today, a reversal of a half-century ago when it was like the F
and N words.
But the authors soon get into a presentation of “essentialism”
v. “existentialism” (Sartre).They see
essentialism as a roadblock to gay acceptance.Essentialism is connected to assimilation, which wa the earlier model of
gay rights, starting with Mattachine and Frank Kameny back in the 1950s.The authors continually point out moral
ironies.“The ‘it’s not our fault’ idea easily
slips into portraying homosexuality as inferior” and “By focusing on the
acceptable face of white, middle-class educated gay and lesbian people, they
often maintain the oppression of those do not fit that (the queerer umbrella).”
(p. 26).Soon the authors visit “intersectionality”,
which they attribute to Kimberle Crenshaw.
Later they explore “heterosexism” and associated privilege,
which can work against you. Then on p, 134, they return to “Strategic
essentialism” where an avatar says “Strategic essentialism might involve, for
example, remaining quiet about the differences between individuals within the group
as they fight for a common goal, despite engaging in those debates privately.” (p.
134).Then, “a place for identity
politics after all?”
There is also the point that transgender transitions may be
viewed as a way of giving in to conventional gender expectations. There is a
reference to Lee Edelman’s book “No Future” (2004) and its tying reproduction
to “cruel optimism” (p. 160). There was no reference to Paul Rosenfels's polarity theory, which I would have expected to find.
Linda Villarosa has a booklet-length piece in the New York
Times magazine on April 11 (for April 15), “Why America’s Black Mothers and
Babies Are in a Life-and-Death Crisis”, link. The tagline is “The answer to the
disparity in death rates has everything to do with the experience of being a
black woman in America.” The magazine cover is dedicated to the article.
The article goes beyond an hereditary factors (like high
blood pressure associated with resistance to sickle cell) to social conditions,
and maintains that there are many issues with the availability and job
performance of doulas (caregivers).
The black infant mortality rate is 11.3 per 1000 as opposed to
4.9 per 1000 for whites.
The story starts with the narrative of Simone Landrum, and
notes how early morning sickness comes with nausea and ravenousness at the same
time.
This is all rather remarkable, as is the police profiling and
BLM movement, even after eight years of Obama in office.
Again, I’ll have to get it and read it, in time. But there is already a lot of controversy.
It can be said that old fashioned conservatism, especially the social side, got plundered by the Internet starting in the late 90s. A “don’t ask don’t tell” mentality could not survive.
So today, we have an understandable war about privacy, and even the idea that the “user is the product.”
But the Internet also fed conservative media a certain way, so it tended to feed a certain mindset with reactionary tribal mindset. So conservative media lost its own way, with regards to normal journalistic standards.
Jonathan Chait takes all this up in New York Magazine here.
It’s also “right” to let National Review speak up about this (in a piece by Guy Benson) since the history of William Buckley seems to be an issue.
Alex W. Palmer has a booklet-length story in the New York
Times about the arrests of booksellers in Hong Kong, a topic covered before.
This time it is the saga of Lam Wing-kee, who was first
collared in 2015 at a customs checkpoint at the mainline.
But the story also indicates that “banned books” are
actually disappearing even in Hong Kong, as mainland publishers take
control.
There is a lot of history about publlisher Bao Pu. There is a
lot of history of the cultural revolution, when intellectuals were sent to the countryside
to become proles back in the 1960s.
The problems of censorship increase as Xingping consolidates lifetime power, and yet Xingping's official ideology, which Chinese students memorize, sounds like a hodgepodge.
I can remember a left-wing bookstore (“Make Up Your Mind”)
in Madison, NJ in the 1970s, where the owners saw the Chinese as morally pure
but not the Soviets.
Well, there is an antidote to Wolff’s “Fire and Fury”.That would be Ronald Kessler’s “The Trump
White House: Changing the Rules of the Game”, available on Amazon today, 304
pages.
I can’t find any conventional “professional” reviews
yet.But Devan Cole discusses the book
on CNN on an April 1 interview with Jake Tapper, where the book claims that
Kellyanne Conway is the chief leaker.
The Amazon link ishereand has some reviews, some of which think the
book is objective and some claim it is Trump propaganda.
I’ll order it soon for a more full review.
Trey Yingst of OANN said he had already read it today and expected
to see Trump tweet about it!Young
adults recently in college are used to hundreds of pages of reading a day (like
my own 50 pages of poetry for every English class at GWU, or Jack Andraka’s
doing all his homework on airplanes -- how about memorizing nomenclature for organic chemistry).That’s a lot more reading that Trump can tolerate, beyond his Fox news on the idiot box (or plasma screen).
Trump does respect people (including journalists) whom he
thinks could have won out on his “The Apprentice” reality show.
Since the 1990s I have been very involved with fighting the military "don't ask don't tell" policy for gays in the military, and with First Amendment issues. Best contact is 571-334-6107 (legitimate calls; messages can be left; if not picked up retry; I don't answer when driving) Three other url's: doaskdotell.com, billboushka.com johnwboushka.com Links to my URLs are provided for legitimate content and user navigation purposes only.
My legal name is "John William Boushka" or "John W. Boushka"; my parents gave me the nickname of "Bill" based on my middle name, and this is how I am generally greeted. This is also the name for my book authorship. On the Web, you can find me as both "Bill Boushka" and "John W. Boushka"; this has been the case since the late 1990s. Sometimes I can be located as "John Boushka" without the "W." That's the identity my parents dealt me in 1943!
p> Privacy Policy for billsbookreviews.blogspot.com
If you require any more information or have any questions about my privacy policy, please feel free to contact me by email at JBoushka@aol.com.
At billsbookreviews.blogspot.com , the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to me. This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by billsbookreviews.blogspot.com and how it is used.
Log Files Like many other Web sites, billsbookreviews.blogspot.com makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol ( IP ) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider ( ISP ), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user’s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.
Cookies and Web Beacons billsbookreviews.blogspot.com does not use cookies.
DoubleClick DART Cookie
.:: Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on billsbookreviews.blogspot.com .
.:: Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to your users based on their visit to billsbookreviews.blogspot.com and other sites on the Internet.
.:: Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following link.
Some of our advertising partners may use cookies and web beacons on my site. My advertising partners include ....... Google Adsense
These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on billsbookreviews.blogspot.com send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.
billsbookreviews.blogspot.com has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.
You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. billsbookreviews.blogspot.com 's privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.
If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browsers' respective websites.
Especially for EU visitors: This site uses cookies from Google to deliver its services, to personalize ads and to analyze traffic. Information about your use of this site is shared with Google. By using this site, you agree to its use of cookies. For more info visit https://www.google.com/policies/technologies/cookies/